Timeline
- (Context) Reviewed the existing end-of-session dev-diary prompt template against active schema, recent dev-diary entries, and current content security checks.
- (Observation) The previous template was structurally strong but relied on a legacy topic allowlist and did not enforce stronger quality/evidence expectations.
- (Action) Proposed a next-level upgrade plan covering schema-aligned topics, stronger security scrub rules, higher-signal event quality, and overlap/delta handling.
- (Action) Replaced the legacy topic allowlist with schema-aligned taxonomy rules in the dev-diary template.
- (Action) Added mandatory narrative-integrity, duplicate-control, and security/privacy scrub requirements for entry generation.
- (Action) Added an explicit quality rubric for Action, Observation, and Open Thread sections while preserving strict ADDEG formatting constraints.
- (Observation) Verified the updated template content saved correctly and remains compatible with current frontmatter/body constraints for dev-diary generation.
- (Open Thread) Run a template dry-run generation against a real session to score entry quality and tighten rubric language further.
Context
- Reviewed the current dev-diary template and compared it with active project schema expectations.
- This work focused on evolving generation quality and safety controls, not changing the website rendering logic.
Actions
- Replaced the legacy topic allowlist with schema-aligned taxonomy rules in the dev-diary template.
- Added mandatory security/privacy scrub guidance to prevent absolute-path, secret, and personal-data leakage.
- Added duplicate-entry delta controls so same-day follow-up entries log only new progress.
- Added a high-signal quality rubric to improve specificity, validation clarity, and actionability.
Observations
- The upgraded template now better matches the evolved dev-diary ecosystem and content safety requirements.
- Stronger emphasis on implemented-versus-validated outcomes should improve historical trace quality.
- The format strictness remains intact while quality standards are significantly higher.
Open Threads
- Run a real-session dry run and review output quality against the new rubric.
- Consider adding a lightweight scoring block for consistency checks across future generated entries.
Boundary Reminder:
Seeds. No maintenance. No roadmap.